WHAT IS LIMITS ETHICAL FOR HUMAN CLONING? IT EXISTS OR ONLY IT IS TO WAIT NOT DESTROY MORE THE WORLD AND THE HUMAN RACE?
The CLONING are identical copies of an organism. It is as if the body is modeled in the same way in all respects.
Can also be defined as obtaining an individual from a cell or a nucleus from another individual.
You can define a HUMAN CLONING, genetically the same as copying an individual will get their DNA, and obtained using different procedures like another embryo to another, with the same genetic load, the same DNA.
Cloning is a different method of using stem cells to cure certain diseases, which could be very useful in cases which were not a match with someone sick.
Also in the case of animals could be used to improve a species, increasing the potential for meat animals, to improve people’s hunger and make better the quality of livestock and agriculture.
But the question is where to get that scientific advances, and as would be used if, as in the case of Dr.Panayiotis Zavos have clone human cells recognizes both living and dead.
Dr. Panayiotis Zavos claims he can clone human and he is in the way to have the first human clones
What is the limit of the ethical issues of genetic manipulation?
Panayiotis Zavos acknowledges cloned 14 human embryos, and transferring 11 of them to the array of four women who are ready to give birth to cloned babies.
The process was filmed in a secret laboratory that is located, although it is believed to be located in the middle east where there is no law against human cloning.
The Cypriot nationality Panayiotis Zavos Ph.Dr goes against taboos about human cloning that is prohibited by law in some countries, the documentary says that none of the women terminate with the pregnancies, and that this is only the beginning to produce a baby cloned
It also conducted experiments with dead cells, cloning experiments in cadavers, those samples came from a boy who died 18 years after surgery, a girl of 11 years died in a car crash, and a man of 33 years died in a car accident.
The experiment with cells killed was the creation of a human embryo – cow was used as human material but also to form a cow embryo experimentation.
In science and in the majority of people have already begun to call the Dr. Frankenstein of the twenty-first century.
What ethic is to wanna break with the limit to clone another human being?
According to the expectations of Panayiotis Zavos Ph.D in two years and could begin to be carried out pregnancies with cloned embryos that reached birth.
We also limit that passes, that it will help improve the quality of life or parents who want children with this eye color, such color, the IQ, save personalities cells for cloning , etc, we are trying to believe that we are the creators of the human race then that will also have the power to decide who lives or dies pq does not fit the canons of what we seek.
Cloning as scientific method can be very helpful to improve the quality of life, increase food to end hunger in the world, that people have to eat, but what is the limit to that? The problem is not in scientific progress, the problem is we humans who can make the ability to clone, and will be ready enough to put ethics and do not believe a limited god.
Time will tell, and future generations may judge, if it is to achieve this breakthrough, which destroy the world or the best.
WHAT FUTURE DESERVE US ?
Video present by the Discovery
If you wanna read this article in spanish click the link below – si quieres ver este articulo en español clickea el link posterior
Filed under: health, human knowledge, religion, videos | Tagged: celulas cadavericas, clonacion, clonacion humana, clonate, deathly cells, dr.frankenstein del XXI, embriones, embryos, human clonate, Panayiotis Zavos, panayiotis zavos ph.dr |